Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1206

reference
450-tree-1
name
1206
tree-preservation-order

undefined

450-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.006768 50.890860)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.006740 50.890857,-1.006741 50.890863,-1.006745 50.890868,-1.006759 50.890875,-1.006768 50.890876,-1.006777 50.890875,-1.006785 50.890872,-1.006791 50.890868,-1.006797 50.890858,-1.006796 50.890852,-1.006792 50.890847,-1.006786 50.890843,-1.006769 50.890840,-1.006760 50.890840,-1.006752 50.890843,-1.006746 50.890847,-1.006740 50.890857)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL